YUVAL WEBER, PH.D Curriculum Vitae

Kennan Institute Associate Professor of Russian and Eurasian Studies

Email: yuvalweber@gmail.com, weber@dmgs.org,  yuval_weber@fas.harvard.edu

(USA): +1-214-264-5451| Skype: yuval.weber | (RUS): +7-968-681-34-52

 

Current Affiliations

The Daniel Morgan Graduate School                                                           
Kennan Institute Associate Professor of Russian and Eurasian Studies        2018-present
Kennan Institute Fellow                                                                                            2017-2018
Woodrow Wilson Center
Global Fellow 2017-2019

Davis Center for Russian and Eurasian Studies, Harvard University
Center Associate                                                                                                         2017-2020

National Research University – Higher School of Economics (Moscow, Russia)
Assistant Professor, Faculty of World Economy and International Affairs    2014-present

Previous Affiliations

Government Department, Harvard University                                         2016-2017

Visiting Assistant Professor

The Carnegie Moscow Center, Moscow, Russia

Nonresident Research Associate                                                                     2014-2016

Visiting Research Fellow                                                                                    2012-2013

New Economic School (Rossiskaya Ekonomicheskaya Shkola), Moscow, Russia

Visiting Professor, NES-HSE joint baccalaureate program                           2012-2014

Courses Taught

Russian Politics and Statecraft – BA and MA

Russian Grand Strategy and Foreign Policy – MA

Politics and Economics of Central Asia and the Caucasus – BA and MA

Globalized Eurasia – BA and MA

International Relations Theory – BA

Politics and Economics of Energy – MA

War and Integration in Eurasia – BA and MA

Research Methods for the Social Sciences – MA

 

 

Education

Ph.D in GovernmentUniversity of Texas-Austin                                                                    2008-2014

International Relations (Foreign Policy), Comparative Politics (Political Economy)

“Petropolitics and Foreign Policy: Fiscal and Institutional Origins of Soviet and

Russian Foreign Policy, 1964-2012”

University of Chicago                                                                   Class of 2006

MA in International Relations, Division of Social Sciences

Specializations: International Relations Theory, Foreign Policy

University of Texas-Austin                                                         Class of 2004

BA in Government

BA in Russian, East European, and Eurasian Studies

BA in Russian Language and Literature

BA in Czech Language and Literature

BA in Plan II (multi-disciplinary Honors program)

 

Monographs

Designed to Fail: Patterns in Russian Economic Reform, 1861-2018. Agenda Publishing/Columbia University Press. Under contract. Estimated completion June 2018.

Failing to Change the Rules: Liberal and Illiberal Sources of Dissatisfaction in International Politics. Manuscript under process.

Russian Hong Kong: The Kuril Islands and Security in East Asia. With Dmitri Trenin. Washington, DC and Moscow: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. 2013. English: http://carnegieendowment.org/files/russia_pacific_future_upd.pdf

Russian: http://carnegieendowment.org/files/WP_VeberTrenin_web_RUS.pdf

 

Book Chapters

 “Khokkeynaya Diplomatiya / Hockey Diplomacy,” in Ledeneva, AV (Ed), (2018). The Global Encyclopaedia of Informality, Volume 2.  London: UCL Press. With Yoshiko Herrera, University of Wisconsin-Madison.

“Petropolitics: Energy Resources and Russian Foreign Policy,” in Tsygankov, AP (Ed), (2018). The Routledge Handbook of Russian Foreign Policy. London: Routledge.

“The Juiciest Fruit Left on the Vine: Ukraine as a Bargaining Failure,” in Soroka, G, and Stepniewski, T (Eds), (2018). Ukraine After Maidan: Revisiting Domestic and Regional Security. Hannover: Ibedem-Verlag.

 

 

 

Articles

“What Can Russia Teach Us about Change? Status-Seeking as a Catalyst for Transformation in International Politics” International Studies Review (2018). Advance preprint available at https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viy024.

“Running in Place: The Latest Round of Russian Economic Modernization”. Russia Political Economy Project, Foreign Policy Research Institute. March 2018. https://www.fpri.org/article/2018/03/running-place-latest-round-russian-economic-modernization/.

 “The Roots and Future of Putin’s Political System” Aspenia Journal, no. 79 (2018).

“Russian Foreign Policy in the Middle East: Multiple Drivers, Uncertain Outcomes”. Black Sea Strategy Paper, Foreign Policy Research Institute. Autumn 2017.

“Commitment Issues: The Syrian and Ukraine Crises as Bargaining Failures of the Post-Cold War International Order” – Problems of Post-Communism published online June 29, 2017 at http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10758216.2017.1330660. With Andrej Krickovic, Higher School of Economics.

“Russia and the Black Sea: 19th Century Challenges, 21st Century Tools”. Foreign Policy Research Institute Policy Paper. Spring 2017.

“An Illiberal World Order? The BRICS Challenge to The U.S.-Led Political Order”. Orbis. Winter 2017 Volume 60, Issue 1.

“Liberalism vs. Anti-Liberalism as the Sources of ‘cold war’ in the Post-Soviet Space”. Baltic Rim Economies. February 2017, 1/2017.

“To Harass and Wait Out: Sources of American Conduct Towards Russia” Russia in Global Affairs, № 2 April/June 2016. http://eng.globalaffairs.ru/number/To-Harass-and-Wait-Out-18070. With Andrej Krickovic, Higher School of Economics.

“Are We in a Cold War or Not? 1989, 1991, and Great Power Dissatisfaction” e-IR. http://www.e-ir.info/2016/03/07/are-we-in-a-cold-war-or-not-1989-1991-and-great-power-dissatisfaction/

“New Cold War?” Survival 57.6 (2015): 215-217. With Andrej Krickovic.

“Why a new Cold War with Russia is inevitable”. Brookings Institution, Order from Chaos. Published September 30, 2015 at http://www.brookings.edu/blogs/order-from-chaos/posts/2015/09/30-new-cold-war-with-russia-krickovic-weber.

Review article: “Red Gas: Russia and the Origins of the European Energy Dependence” by Per Högselius. Cold War History. Print. 2015.

Review article: “Russia and the World: The Internal-External Nexus” by Natasha Kuhrt. e-International Relations. Web. 2015.

 

 

Press

“Vladimir Putin’s Legacy Project”, Aspen Institute. Published April 4, 2018 at https://www.aspeninstitute.it/aspenia-online/article/vladimir-putin-and-his-legacy-project.

“The Sinister Echoes of 1917 in Today’s Russia” Aspen Institute. Online preprint published September 11, 2017 at https://www.aspeninstitute.it/aspenia-online/article/sinister-echoes-1917-today%E2%80%99s-russia.

“Hopes and Limits of the Trump-Putin Partnership” Aspen Institute. Online preprint published July 11, 2017 at https://www.aspeninstitute.it/aspenia-online/article/hopes-and-limits-trump-putin-relationship.

“The Green Man of Russian Politics: Alexei Navalny” Aspen Institute. Online preprint published May 17, 2017 at https://www.aspeninstitute.it/aspenia-online/article/green-man-russia-alexei-navalny.

“The Russian Factor in European Politics” Aspen Institute. Online preprint published March 27, 2016 at http://www.aspeninstitute.it/aspenia-online/article/“russian-factor”-european-politics.

“The Emerging Costs of Russia’s Mideast Presence” Aspen Institute. Online preprint published December 30, 2016 at https://www.aspeninstitute.it/aspenia-online/article/emerging-costs-russia’s-mideast-presence.

“What does Putin really want? Trump’s presidency will show us” Washington Post, Monkey Cage. Published December 28, 2016 at https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2016/12/28/what-does-putin-really-want-trumps-presidency-will-show-us/

“The Insiders: Oil money, conflict and the age of diminished expectations in Russia”

Business New Europe. Published September 30, 2015 at http://www.bne.eu/content/story/insiders-oil-money-conflict-and-age-diminished-expectations-russia-0.

“Why the U.S. Does Nothing in Ukraine” Washington Post, Monkey Cage. Published March 18, 2015 at http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/monkey-cage/wp/2015/03/18/why-the-u-s-does-nothing-in-ukraine/.

“What Should We Do About the Weakening Ruble, Lower Oil Prices, and Sanctions?”

Carnegie Moscow Center. Published December 23, 2014 at http://carnegie.ru/eurasiaoutlook/?fa=57595.

“OPEC Cuts Into Russian Coffers, But Will Expensive Grand Strategy Live On?”

Carnegie Moscow Center. Published December 2, 2014 at http://carnegie.ru/eurasiaoutlook/?fa=57360.

“Weak Ruble Exchange Rate Represents Political Bargaining Challenge?” Carnegie Moscow Center. Published November 19, 2014 at http://carnegie.ru/eurasiaoutlook/?fa=57261.

“Budet li ukrainskaya lustratsiya pokhozha na irakskuyu?” [Will the Ukrainian Lustration Look Like the Iraqi?]. RBK online. Published October 31, 2014 at http://daily.rbc.ru/opinions/politics/31/10/2014/54523379cbb20f6a14ae1e85 With Shlomo Weber.

“Will Lustration Help or Hinder Ukrainian Reform?” Carnegie Moscow Center. Published October 29, 2014 at http://carnegie.ru/eurasiaoutlook/?fa=57064.

“For Putin, It Gets More and More Expensive to Buy Loyalty of Russian Ruling Elites.”

Forbes Online. Published June 21, 2012 at

http://www.forbes.com/sites/yuliataranova/2012/06/21/for-putin-it-gets-more-and-more-expensive-to-buy-loyalty-of-russian-ruling-elites/

“Putin vynuzhden pokupat’ loyal’nost’ possiiskoi pravyaschei elityi vse bolee vysokoi tsenoi.” Translation of Forbes article into Russian by Inopressa. Published June 22, 2012 at http://www.inopressa.ru/article/22Jun2012/forbes/putin_elita.html.

“Why only Putin 2.0 has a chance at success.” Dallas Morning News. Published February 19, 2012. With Shlomo Weber.

“Kak tyazhela i slozhna bor’ba s byednostiu.” [The Costly and Difficult Struggle Against Poverty]. RBK online. Published October 4, 2011 at http://www.rbcdaily.ru/focus/opinion/562949981652753.shtml. With Shlomo Weber.

“Monogoroda: amerikanskii podkhod: kak v SShA reshaiut prolemy gorodow, ostavshikhsya bez raboty.” [Monotowns: an American Approach: How in the United States They Solve the Problems of Towns that are Left without Work]. Forbes Russia online. Published December 1, 2010 at http://www.forbes.ru/ekonomika/vlast/60440-monogoroda-amerikanskii-podhod.With Shlomo Weber.

“The Jews of Telc: Ano, Tady Byli, ale Už Nejsou [Yes, They Were Here, But Not Anymore].” Kosmas 18.2 (Spring): 74-89.

Working Papers Under Submission

  • “When War is Preferable to Peace: Russia, the Post-Cold War Settlement, and the Kremlin’s Policy towards Ukraine” under review at Journal of Post-Soviet Politics and Society.
  • “Regime Transitions and Lustration: Backward and Forward-Looking Institutional Design” with Shlomo Weber (Southern Methodist University)
  • “Three Worlds of Hierarchy: Influence & Integration in World Politics” with Theocharis Grigoriadis (Freie Universität, Berlin)

 

Conferences and Invited Talks

  • Forthcoming

Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium

2nd Ghent-Russia Colloquium Keynote Speaker: “Russia’s Political Economy Since 1992: Back to the Future?”

Association for Slavic, East European and Eurasian Studies, Boston, MA,

“Explaining Variation in Post-Communist Governance: Networks, Institutions, and Windfall Revenues”

 Association for Slavic, East European and Eurasian Studies, Boston, MA,

“Is Russia Around Every Corner? Critical Evaluations of Russian Foreign Policy in Central and Southeastern Europe”

 International Conference on Economics of Football, Moscow, Russia

“Public Debt and Public Diplomacy: The Costs and Benefits of Sports Mega-Events”

 

  • 2018

Woodrow Wilson Center, Congressional Foreign Policy Master Class (two briefings for senior and junior congressional staffers)

           “How the Sausage is Made: Putin’s Government, Central Players, and Policy Process”

Global Relations Forum, Istanbul, Turkey (second presentation for Young Academics Program)

“Russia and Turkey in a Power Vacuum: American Uncertainty and Policy Options for Moscow and Ankara”

Columbia University, Harriman Institute

            “Russia After Putin’s Reelection?”

University of Texas at Austin

“Election 2018: Putin and the Future of Russia’s Political Economy”

George Washington University, Institute for European, Russian, and Eurasian Studies, Program on New Approaches to Research and Security in Eurasia, New Voices Speaker’s Series,

“Any Hopes or Changes From Russia’s Next Presidential Election?”

Center for Strategic and International Studies, Russia and Eurasia Program, Washington, DC

            “Social Inequality and the Russian Economy”

  • 2017

Pacific Council on International Policy annual conference

         “Understanding Russia’s Ambitions”

Global Relations Forum, Istanbul, Turkey (first presentation for Young Academics Program)

“Russia and Turkey in a Power Vacuum: American Uncertainty and Policy Options for Moscow and Ankara”

Northeast Association for Slavic, East European and Eurasian Studies, New York “Commitment Issues: Ukraine, Syria, and Arresting Relative Decline”

International Conference on Economics of Football, Kazan, Russia

“Belonging and Competence: Sports Mega-Events and Public Diplomacy Strategies for Emerging Powers”

Yale University, International Security Studies Colloquium, New Haven, CT, “Too Big for Eurasia, Too Small for the World: Russian Hierarchy Building”

Columbia University, Harriman Institute, New York – Columbia/NYU New York Russia Public Policy Seminar (invited panel)

“The Reset Trap? Reconfiguring U.S.-Russia Relations in a Time of International Uncertainty” with Stephen Kotkin and Daniel Nexon

International Studies Association, Baltimore, MD, USA (Presidential session) “Understanding Change in World Politics: The View from Moscow” “The Sources and Consequences of Hierarchy in Post-Soviet Space”

European Union Studies Association, Miami, FL, USA

“Eastern Partnership and Eurasian Union: Theory and Evidence on Competing Hierarchies in Post-Soviet Space”

Columbia University, New York

“Evaluating the Re-Reset”

 

  • 2016

University of Wisconsin, Madison

“The Sources and Consequences of Hierarchy in Post-Soviet Space”

Columbia University, New York

“Lustration in the Former Soviet Space”

Association for Slavic, East European and Eurasian Studies, Washington, DC, USA “Lustration as a foreign policy tool to limit or maintain external hierarchy with an outside power: Evidence from the former Soviet Union, 1992-2015”

International Studies Association, Asia-Pacific meeting, Hong Kong “Systemic Challenge and the Russia-China Security Relationship”

Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi, Romania

“The End of One Cold War and the Beginnings of Another: Structural Challenges to the International Political Order and the Consequences for the Eastern Partnership Area”

Harvard University, Davis Center for Russian and Eurasian Studies, Cambridge, MA

“Post-Soviet Regime Transitions and Lustration: Internal Policy Choices to Challenge or Accept Russian Political Hierarchy”

Harvard University, Davis Center for Russian and Eurasian Studies, Cambridge, MA “1989 vs. 1991: The End of the Cold War, the End of the USSR, and the Origins of Russia’s Dissatisfaction with Both”

 

  • 2015

New Economic School, Center for the Study of Diversity and Social Interactions Winter School, Vladivostok (Far East Federal University)

“Threat of Rebellion from Former Regime Officials: Ethnic Diversity and Extent of Lustration”

“Declining Challengers and Regional Security: The Russian Pivot to Asia”

The Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow: Ukrainian Crisis and Integrations Processes in the Post-Soviet Space

 “Did the contemporary international political order start in 1989 or 1991? Systemic challenges and conflict in Ukraine”

Freie Universität Berlin, Institute for East European Studies

Volkswagen Summer School: Governance, Markets And Institutions: Russia And Germany Compared “Multilevel security hierarchies: Russia, war, & Eurasian integration”

European Consortium for Political Research, Montreal, Canada (panel sessions)

“Regime Transitions and Lustration: Backward and Forward-Looking Institutional Design” and “Eurasian Integration and Russia’s Disparate Foreign Policies”

International School of Economics – Tbilisi State University (Georgia) “Bargaining Over Lustration”

Perm State University (Perm, Russia), The (not so) Discreet Charm of Clientelism: Comparative Perspectives on Patron-Client Relation

 “Power Transitions and Hierarchical Relations”

Bundestag, Foreign Policy Committee (Berlin)

Invited background talks on Russian foreign policy issue

International Studies Association, New Orleans, USA (panel session)

 “Is Geography Still Destiny? Russia as a Modern Day Continental Power”

Technische Universität Dresden (Germany), Department of Political Science “Bargaining Breakdowns and War Onset in Ukraine”

 

  • 2014

 

Center for the Study of Diversity and Social Interactions (New Economic School) Winter School (Suzdal, Russia)

“Regime Transitions and Lustration: Backward and Forward-Looking Institutional Design”

Bundestag, Foreign Policy Committee (Berlin)

Invited for talks on Russian foreign policy issues by Christian Democratic Union

Association for Slavic, East European and Eurasian Studies, San Antonio, USA “Great Powers, Emerging Technologies, and Regionalism in Eurasia”

Higher School of Economics-Harvard Working Group on US-Russia relations Biannual meeting (Moscow)

 

  • 2013

 

Association for Slavic, East European and Eurasian Studies, Boston, USA (panel session) “Revolution, State Power, and Foreign Policy: International Relations between Russia and its Neighbors”

Association for Slavic, East European and Eurasian Studies, (panel session) “Russian National Identity: Implications for Foreign Policy” (discussant)

American Political Science Association, (panel session), Chicago, USA

 “Power, Persuasion, and Authority in the Great Powers: Russia, China, and EU”

Program on New Approaches to Research and Security in Eurasia (PONARS Eurasia) “Rethinking the Sources of Russian Foreign Policy,” George Washington University Institute for European, Russian and Eurasian Studies

RST 644, POLITICS & STATECRAFT OF SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA

While threats of the 20th century arose from powerful nation states, the key dimensions of the future – globalization, multi-national violent conflicts, and the potential proliferation of weapons of mass destruction mean great dangers from the relative weak states and ungoverned areas of Africa. Globalization enhances the awareness of the world to the most basic events, making speed of analysis and decision making more important and the consequences more significant. The objective of this course is to transform how professionals think about Africa and its interactions with the rest of the world.

INT 714, COUNTER INTELLIGENCE

The aim of this course is to show how counterintelligence activity protects US national security by 1) defending against acts of penetration, sabotage, and physical violence undertaken by foreign intelligence agencies and 2) defeating an adversary’s efforts by identifying and manipulating its behavior through deception and/or the exploitation of its agents. The course addresses the relationship between the intelligence and law enforcement communities as well as between civilian and military agencies. It also emphasizes the increasing importance of cyber espionage and economic espionage in an age of globalization.

Through this course, students will

NSC 732, LOW INTENSITY CONFLICT

The course is a detailed examination of the theory and practice of conflict in circumstances less than general conventional war. Key concepts and strategic principles pertaining to asymmetric warfare, terrorism, insurgency and counterinsurgency, irregular warfare, unconventional warfare, and military operations less than war (peacekeeping and humanitarian assistance) will be examined. This course examines the causes, conduct, patterns, and effects of conflict short of total or general war. It covers the modern insurgency period from Mao Tse Tung’s approach in the Chinese Civil War through our present times with the Global Jihad.
It asks four fundamental questions in the U.S. context:

RST 727, RUSSIAN POLITICS AND STATECRAFT

This survey course on Russian politics and statecraft addresses enduring questions on: patterns of cooperation and confrontation with other great powers, a centrally dominated economy, and a political culture that exploits weak formal political institutions to sustain a very small leadership ground. In addressing these issues, we ask: What are the wars that have defined Russia’s borders? When and why do Russian leaders challenge other states? What does power in Russia look like? Who are the rulers and their supporters? How do they obtain, practice, and lose power?
In reviewing the origins and practices of Russian statecraft, we will assess when Russia as a great power has been (dis-) satisfied with the international distribution of economic and political benefits, and when it has sought to revise or maintain the international order. We will use this knowledge to address current issues in Russia’s relations with the Euro-Atlantic alliance and other world powers, including contentious issues such as money laundering, sanctions regimes, “information wars,” and Russia’s declared and undeclared conflicts.

NSC 601, INTRODUCTION TO NATIONAL SECURITY

This course is divided into four parts. Part I will focus on generally accepted concepts of deception and counter deception with an emphasis on the underlying concepts that enable operational and strategic deceptions. Part II is designed to introduce the student to operational level deception and its impact on national decision making and warning. Part III will build upon parts one and two in order to facilitate the construction of a holistic model for Russian Strategic Deception and Information Confrontation. Part IV will move beyond strategic military and information confrontation and analyze strategic-political deception and provocations and apply previous concepts to a detailed analysis of current events.

INT 746, CYBER INTELLIGENCE

This course examines the vast frontier of Cyberspace and the Internet over which travels ever increasing amounts of information and communications. This new dimension of power has strong positive and negative implications for U.S. national security strategy and policy. For national security, Cyberspace represents a unique challenge, as it has no borders or boundaries unlike previous power dimensions — land, sea, air and space. Past separations between government and the private sector and national security and law enforcement have been blurred. Cyberspace also represents an arena where a non-state actor’s powers can equal or exceed any nation state. And, 20th Century based government institutions often have trouble reacting to its 21st century instantaneous speed, ubiquity and volume.
By the end of the course, the student will be able to:

RST 643, THE CONTEMPORARY MIDDLE EAST: A NEW LOOK AT CHANGING REGIONAL DYNAMICS

This course aims to provide students with an understanding of the changing regional dynamics of the Middle East. The region serves as the primary source for international energy consumption, yet remains an epicenter of instability, radicalism and terrorism. The 2010 Arab uprisings, Iran’s quest for nuclear capability and the rapid expansion of Islamic State have greatly increased the volatility by threatening the sovereignty and territorial integrity of regional states. A resurgence of political Islam and growing sectarian divide between Sunnis and Shiites add to the regional disorder. Middle Eastern states too weak to control their territory lack the legitimacy or kinetic ability to exert full control over their borders. In these fragile areas, state and non-state threats thrive and pose tremendous national security challenges and concerns for the region and beyond.
The course will examine the national security challenges facing Syria, Lebanon, Iraq, Turkey, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Jordan, Israel, and the Palestinians, and analyze how recent shifting political, social, and economic dynamics impact them. The course will focus on the regional actors’ attitudes of the challenges and threats they face and on the strategies they have chosen to confront them. It thus provides critical perspective to students seeking a more comprehensive understanding of the changing Middle Eastern landscape and foreign policy. The course is designed for students interested in the Middle East, particularly those interested in national security issues, students of comparative politics and future practitioners, with a curiosity in regional studies.

INT 639 – RESEARCH METHODS FOR THE SOCIAL SCIENCES

This course examines the vast frontier of Cyberspace and the Internet over which travels ever increasing amounts of information and communications. This new dimension of power has strong positive and negative implications for U.S. national security strategy and policy. For national security, Cyberspace represents a unique challenge, as it has no borders or boundaries unlike previous power dimensions — land, sea, air and space. Past separations between government and the private sector and national security and law enforcement have been blurred. Cyberspace also represents an arena where a non-state actor’s powers can equal or exceed any nation state. And, 20th Century based government institutions often have trouble reacting to its 21st century instantaneous speed, ubiquity and volume.
By the end of the course, the student will be able to:

The overall objectives/learning outcomes are to:
Equip students with the ability, skills and knowledge to conduct and produce quality research in the rapidly changing environment of 21st social science; and

MDV 650, FOUNDATIONS OF MANAGING DISRUPTION AND VIOLENCE

The Managing Disruption and Violence (MDV) Program provides theoretical and practical training to help students gain a better understanding of the persuasive communication principles, concepts, and processes organizations need to address the potential or active threat of disruptive or violent group behavior. MDV 650 integrates a broad overview of the material included in MDV 700 Integrated Risk Value Concepts and MDV 701 Causal Analytics for the non-MDV major. The Integrated Risk Value© (IRV) methodology provides the practical skills needed to develop and manage successful persuasive communications programs. MDV 650 is a prerequisite for non-MDV majors to take MDV 702 Strategy for Managing Disruption and Violence.

NSC 707 – U.S. MILITARY STRATEGY

Globalization, the IT revolution, and ethno-nationalist and religious tensions have altered traditional conceptions of warfare. This course will accordingly analyze the effects of current global political, economic, and technological trends on US military plans and operations. It will address the need for less unilateralism and more coalitions of the willing in future as well as closer integration of civilian and military leadership in counterinsurgency and nation-building operations.
The course will also address the importance of winning “the war of perception” among democracies, which increasingly oppose casualties and challenge the lawfulness of warfare, domestic budgetary issues, and the strategic implications of doing more with less. There will be special emphasis on US Naval Strategy.
The objectives of this course are:

INT 712, COLLECTION, ANALYSIS AND PRESENTATION

This course provides a critical overview of the Intelligence Cycle – from collection to analysis to presentation. The course assesses intelligence-gathering techniques and approaches for various types of information including HUMINT, SIGINT, etc. It then acquaints students with aspects of Intelligence Analysis; the evaluation of data through the use of subject expertise, critical thinking, and the application of techniques designed to overcome limitations in human cognition. It will examine the analysts’ role in the larger national security arena, state, and local organizations and in the private sector. And it will show the importance of the effective presentation of this information under varying circumstances and leadership desires.

Through this course, students will be able to:

MDV 701, CAUSAL ANALYTICS

The Managing Disruption and Violence (MDV) Program provides theoretical and practical training for students to understand the persuasive communication principles, concepts, and processes needed for organizations to address potential or active threats from disruptive or violent group behavior. MDV 701 teaches students to use and evaluate analytics on how audiences perceive issues, what drives them to action, and how to measure effectiveness. The course does not make students experts in doing analytics, but merely how to understand the design, creation and measurement of persuasive strategies from a program management point of view. This course covers many types of behavioral analytics including polling, surveys, experts, big data and others. Concepts such as quantitative, qualitative, quant/qual, discovery and directed search are introduced for MDV majors. Combined with MDV 700 Integrated Risk Value Concepts, MDV 701 provides in-depth practical understanding, processes and concepts needed for MDV majors to become practitioner who manage and evaluate the development, implementation and impact of persuasive strategies.

NSC 733, DIPLOMACY AS AN ELEMENT OF NATIONAL POWER

How is Diplomacy changing in a globalized world with all of the new challenges in the 21st Century? What impact has globalization had on the rules based system of International Order?
In today’s world, broad knowledge and specialized skills are required to build cooperation, defuse tension, and promote peace between and among nations, groups, and other entities. This overview course helps students develop skill sets and prepares them to become an international problem solver in any sector, including public, private, nonprofit, and the military.

INT 610 – FUNDAMENTALS OF INTELLIGENCE

This is an introductory course in intelligence practices for those looking to enter this field or interact with it. The course identifies the component parts of the Intelligence Community, describes the functions of collection and analysis, explains how intelligence is disseminated, and discusses the relationship of the IC with policymakers, Congress, and the public. This course will provide students the foundation of knowledge to prepare for more advanced study in intelligence or related fields.
Students who complete this course will:

• Identify the members of the Intelligence Community and their roles;
• Discuss the intelligence cycle and other functions of intelligence; and
• Analyze the relationship of the IC with the different branches of government and the public

NSC 730, NATIONAL SECURITY PLANNING, STRATEGY AND DECISION MAKING FOR THE 21ST CENTURY

Washington’s problem in a nutshell is that it doesn’t think very well. The last quarter century has seen an explosion in the human capacity to create and manipulate new knowledge—yet many of the instruments used to support national security leadership are as creaky as ever. All this needs to change if America wants to outthink it enemies and it help it friends secure a safe, free, and prosperous future. This course provides both an introduction to the theoretical constructs and practical exercises in the three critical pillars of overseeing national security affairs—planning, strategy, and decision-making. Lessons provide a foundation for the skills, knowledge, and attributes to analyze, address, and manage national security affairs at the operational and strategic levels.

MDV 729, RUSSIAN DECEPTION, OPERATIONS, AND INFORMATION CONFRONTATION

Russian Deception Operations and Information Confrontation is designed to lay the historical, thematic and contemporary context that will provide the fundamental perspective and foundational knowledge required to successfully recognize, analyze and initiate counter deception activates. This course is designed for analysts in order to equip them with the necessary knowledge to understand the impact of Russian deception. This in-depth study of Russian deception practices will trace the evolution of the art specific to Russian over the course of the past century starting in 1917 and ending with the implementation of Russia’s Information Confrontation doctrine. The course is designed to address these issues functionally starting with basic military/tactical deceptions and progressing through the use of strategic enablers, provocations and influence operations.

NSC 712, NUCLEAR WEAPONS/MISSILE DEFENSE/WMD POLICY

Overview: An in depth look at three critical Defense areas of Nuclear Weapons, Missile Defense and Countering WMD Policies that have been revised in 2017 and 2018.
Nuclear Weapons: On January 27, 2017, President Donald Trump directed Secretary of Defense James Mattis to initiate a new Nuclear Posture Review (NPR). The President made clear that his first priority is to protect the United States, allies, and partners. He also emphasized both the long-term goal of eliminating nuclear weapons and the requirement that the United States have modern, flexible, and resilient nuclear capabilities that are safe and secure until such a time as nuclear weapons can prudently be eliminated from the world.
Missile Defense: The Trump administration is working on an expanded U.S. missile defense policy that would address certain threats from Russia and China, departing from a previous strategy that focused nearly exclusively on rogue nations such as North Korea and Iran. The new policy will still call for bolstered technology against rogue states, with a particular focus on weapons to intercept North Korean leader Kim Jong Un’s missiles. But it will also mention the need to consider missile threats from Russia and China, according to people familiar with the review.
Countering WMD: The Department of Defense Strategy for Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction seeks to ensure that the United States and its allies and partners are neither attacked nor coerced by actors with WMD. It outlines three end states: no new WMD possession, no WMD use, and minimization of WMD effects. The strategy also establishes countering WMD priority objectives for the Department of Defense (DoD), defines an approach for achieving them, and identifies essential activities and tasks. Countering WMD (CWMD) objectives focus on cooperative efforts to shape the security environment and take early action against adversaries. These objectives are to reduce incentives to pursue, possess, and employ WMD; to increase the barriers to WMD acquisition, proliferation, and use; to manage WMD risks emanating from hostile, fragile, or failed states and safe havens; and to deny the effects of current and emerging WMD threats through layered, integrated defenses.
This course provides a critical overview of the Intelligence Cycle – from collection to analysis to presentation. The course assesses intelligence-gathering techniques and approaches for various types of information including HUMINT, SIGINT, etc. It then acquaints students with aspects of Intelligence Analysis; the evaluation of data through the use of subject expertise, critical thinking, and the application of techniques designed to overcome limitations in human cognition. It will examine the analysts’ role in the larger national security arena, state, and local organizations and in the private sector. And it will show the importance of the effective presentation of this information under varying circumstances and leadership desires.

RST 645, POLITICS AND STATECRAFT OF LATIN AMERICA

This course provides an introductory view of the politics and statecraft of Latin America from the 19th century through today. It will focus on Latin America’s political history, security, economics, and political economy, with a particular emphasis on the role and influence of the United States in the region. It will also analyze the similarities and differences in how regional and global political and economic trends — independence, populism, revolutionary movements, democratization, and neoliberal reforms — have manifested themselves throughout the region. Course materials will include a mixture of books, articles, and multimedia.

By the end of the course, students should be able to:

RST 732, EURASIAN SECURITY

Coming Soon

ANNA’S STORY

She particularly enjoyed the way that he illuminated the theory of each topic by providing compelling historical examples together with his own personal experience and insights from his illustrious career in the National Security field.

“During the Bosnian wars, Dr. Meyer was The Deputy Chief of the CIA Taskforce in the Balkans. That’s the level of real-world experience that our professors have. We are taught and mentored in classes of around 7 students by faculty of that caliber.  It makes for a phenomenal experience, probably unique to our school, I would venture to say.”

Anna also talks excitedly about Professor James Anibal’s exceptional teaching style where students engage in multiple thought-provoking exercises, including some where they try to build and break deception types, guided by Anibal’s own extensive experience in the field.

“Learning by completing these exercises really cements the theories in our minds. These classes are invaluable to any student interested in the topic and will – without a doubt – make us much better practitioners ourselves.”

Anna also enthuses about the significant potential of the DMGS’ student body, where she has found lifelong friends who share her passion as well as her determination to become a leader in the National Security and Intelligence communities. A testament to her care and pride for her fellow students, Anna takes an active role in DMGS’ Student Government Association, where she has served as Secretary, Treasurer, Vice-President and President.

“I can truly say that I am frequently inspired by the students of DMGS because of their constant drive to do more, achieve more, and learn as much as they can. I, myself, learn something from my fellow students every day.”

Anna is especially appreciative of the external experiences DMGS has made possible for her, including representing the school at the 2017 Women in National Security Conference and competing in the 2017 Atlantic Council Cyber 9/12 Competition. However, perhaps the most memorable opportunity afforded to her by Daniel Morgan was the chance to participate in the Oxford Analytica Global Horizons Conference in Oxford, England, in both 2017 and 2018. It is precisely through such enrichment provided by DMGS that Anna has been able to travel outside the United States for the first time in her life. Wide-eyed, she describes how exploring the campus and halls of the prestigious Christ Church College at Oxford University was a surreal experience for her, as she and her fellow DMGS students were able attend seminars, panels, and plenaries with experts from all over the world. She emphasizes how this experience effectively gave her a chance to expand her knowledge, her worldview, and her overall understanding of the importance of National Security and Intelligence studies at a global level. A lasting memory of this extraordinary opportunity was of the conference black-tie gala at Blenheim Palace, the familial home of Winston Churchill.

“The memory that will forever stand out to me is walking up the Palace stairs in a ball-gown on what was my third day ever in another country. It was truly magical!”

Finally, Anna sums up her experience at the school by crediting DMGS with advancing her career through networking opportunities where she was able to meet career professionals in the National Security and Intelligence communities that she would have never been able to meet otherwise. She is particularly grateful for the faculty who took the time to help her discover her passion so she could determine her career path and who have guided and opened doors for her.

“The school really invests in its students not just through education, but through external experiences as well, and that investment really pays off for us when it comes to establishing our careers. When deciding upon a graduate school, DMGS was my choice without hesitation and I would make the same decision again every time.”

GILBERT’S STORY

He says that his experience at the school has gone well above his already high expectations, going so far as to add that it has completely changed his perspective in multiple areas that he had previously viewed through a more narrow contextual lens.  He is currently enrolled in the National Security M.A. program, with a specialization in International Relations.

“This gives me a special perspective and understanding of security across the globe.  I increasingly understand the importance of studying security issues with a global backdrop since the impact of the National Security is not isolated.  It is intertwined because of the interconnectedness of the modern world.”

To achieve his specific career and learning objectives and work within the confines of his prominent career,, Gilbert is obliged and has been approved to take an accelerated track that would enable him to complete this in only 15 months.

 “The deans and professors at Daniel Morgan have been incredibly supportive in working with me to make the adjustments that I need to achieve my career objectives while meeting all the necessary academic milestones.  They don’t put up roadblocks.  They look for the solutions to the roadblocks.”

Gilbert is also impressed with DMGS’ personalized approach at the instructional level.  He notes that the small classes result in everyone having a chance to express themselves and to better engage with the material being covered.  He also explains how DMGS’ professors have a fascinating way of leading and guiding the class through their subjects, while deftly merging students’ international perspectives into the discussion.

“At this school, different skills and cultures come together in a very special way that enhances the learning experience for every one of us.”

SHANNON’S STORY

Upon her return to the United States, Shannon completed her undergraduate degree in her areas of true passion and was later accepted to continue her graduate studies at University of Glasgow.  However, after one semester there, Shannon came to the realization that the program was not a good fit for her due to its intensely theoretical approach. Having been at the forefront of action rather than deliberation, Shannon found a theoretical program to be too confining for her needs and aspirations.  Luckily, one of her professors at the university was Peter Jackson, a renowned editor of multiple major intelligence publications. Immediately understanding the frustrations of a student who had already experienced so much and wanted to do much more, hee advised her,

“If you are looking for something practical, there is a new, specialized school in Washington D.C. and everyone there has a fundamentally practical approach to graduate studies. I think that it would be a perfect fit and would get you where you want to go.”

Having taken his sage advice, Shannon is now at DMGS in her second semester and says that she is loving the experience.  She goes on to say that Daniel Morgan has certainly lived up to the practical teaching and experience that she was looking for.

To illustrate her point, Shannon talks about one of the first professors she had at DMGS, a former diplomat who worked on the 911 commission and was, therefore, able to give her and her fellow students an inside perspective on actual events that others merely read as history.

Describing one of the biggest differences she is experiencing at Daniel Morgan compared to what she had encountered in higher education thus far, Shannon points to the exceptionally small class sizes:

“I don’t think other graduate students experience the personalized attention we get at DMGS. Each student  gets immediate direction and mentorship; at most graduate schools a student would wait 3 weeks to get a paper back and then would have to make an office appointment 2 weeks after that for in-person guidance . Not here.”

Shannon also enthuses over the extraordinary opportunities that she has been given at DMGS.  Thanks to a trip sponsored by the school, where she went on a week-long security summit just outside Prague, she was introduced to the UN NATO program (Youth Atlantic Treaty Association) and is now a UN NATO Ambassador. This means that, once per month, Shannon attends international conferences around the world.  Shannon is, not only delighted to be a part of this, but is also very grateful for the way her professors at DMGS are so accommodating and encouraging to her in these endeavors.

Another significant advantage of being a DMGS student is the flexibility of having classes scheduled in the evening. Shannon is particularly appreciative of this since it has allowed her to obtain the best internships as well as to get the best out of her internships:

“I am able to work and come to class in the evenings.  Other interns consistently have to leave and come back to work to attend classes during the day.  As a result of DMGS’ class schedule I get better training than the other interns and it makes it easier for me to apply for jobs without class times getting in the way.”

Shannon believes that these factors all play into the reason DMGS graduates get such wonderful career positions upon graduation.

“I couldn’t believe some of the places that DMGS students have gone.  A number of my fellow students have gotten jobs with the top contractors in National Security and one even just got a job at the White House.”

Shannon points out that this is a testament to how good the education and opportunities are at Daniel Morgan. She points out that top firms want DMGS graduates because they are extremely well-prepared, noting that high profile firms are keen to hire DMGS graduates even before the school has obtained the full accreditation status which is expected next year.

Shannon ends her story with a summary of her enthusiasm about the Daniel Morgan School:

“DMGS has been a perfect fit for me. I can’t even describe how wonderful this place is. Everyone is so kind and so intelligent and so well-connected. There is not a better school especially for anyone who has an interest in National Security.  As the school is young, it is like a best kept secret …but it probably won’t be a secret for long.”

TOMASZ’S STORY

Tomasz is now at The Daniel Morgan Graduate School of National Security where he hopes to get an American perspective on issues related to Russian and global security. As he is obviously already extremely well-versed in this area, Tomasz sought out a program with the utmost authority and credibility to augment his own well-established base in the field.  Tomasz found that level of authority when he came across current Daniel Morgan – and former Harvard professor, Yuval Weber’s biography.  Seeing Dr. Weber’s well-documented expertise, Tomasz said that he “realized that DMGS was the right place to be.”

Now that he attends Daniel Morgan, he says that he is even more certain of the fact that DMGS was the place where true expertise in the field resided.  In addition to the formidable intellect of Dr. Weber, Tomasz has also been struck by the depth of national and international expertise that resides within the DMGS faculty as a whole.  In his own area of expertise, he has further been engaged by the extensive knowledge and insights of incoming professor, Dr. Edward Lemon, formerly a professor at Columbia University and now a DMGS-Kennan Institute Fellow. Dr. Lemon is a global authority on Eurasia. Talking enthusiastically about his experience at DMGS, Tomasz notes:

“It gives me a different angle and a truly global perspective in my chosen field which is particularly fascinating. These extremely erudite professors and stimulating courses have really shed light in several areas and have helped to unfasten the complex international geopolitical knot.”

Another reason Tomasz was drawn to The Daniel Morgan Graduate School was the possibility to be in the center of Washington D.C. amidst the hub of prestigious think tanks and media outlets with whom he had hoped to make connections. Tomasz says that his actual experience has greatly exceeded his expectations, as DMGS has given him significant access and entrees to several key organizations through its prestigious partners and events.

“It’s so easy to have extraordinary networking opportunities here at DMGS. Many doors have been opened for me and I have already been connected to many people and organizations that I would not have even dared to imagine.”

MARGALITA’S STORY

“I quit my job and embarked upon my second Master’s degree at DMGS because I realized that program would benefit me a great deal. I would not have left my job if I hadn’t anticipated this and I wasn’t disappointed. It was one of the best decisions that I have ever made as it has now led me to even higher paths.”

Nor was leaving her job an easy decision.  Before DMGS, Margalita had been working for the UN and EU.  She grew up in Tbilisi during the civil war and learned to count from the traces of the bullet holes against a building wall. Coming face to face with war at such a young age affected her career choices in later life and motivated her into positions where she would help people affected by conflict.  Specifically, she worked on projects that supported the Prime Minister’s office in her native country of Georgia. She worked in a new agency commission on a National Action Plan implementing the UN Security Council’s Resolution on Women, Peace and Security. Her assignment was to identify the needs of conflict-affected women and girls.  Together with the UN Women’s Mission as well as several government officials and advisors on human rights, Margalita travelled to villages along the Administrative Boundary Lines. Her mission was to identify the needs of these women and girls and to translate their aggregate problems into policy to support Georgia’s Three – year UN Action Plan.  Margalita then went on to assist in building the necessary capacity to support the implementation of these policies and solutions under the European Union Project.

Margalita says that what drew her to DMGS and what ultimately drove her to take the significant step of leaving her UN position was the quality of the faculty at the school.

“It’s not the name or the history of a school that matters, it’s the professors.”

She is now very glad that she took the steps that she took in coming to DMGS. One of the professors she enthuses over is David Kanin whom she describes as “one of the most educated professors in the universe” and whose classes she describes “are like paradise.”  In fact, Margalita is extremely enthusiastic about all of her professors whom she collectively describes as not just as compelling academicians but as extraordinary individuals.

“Even the five-minute interactions during the class breaks is something that we all look forward to.”

The extent of her satisfaction with the teaching at DMGS has been so great that she insists that the quality benchmark for lectures and discussions is now much higher than previously experienced and that she and her fellow students have consequently become “professor and lecture snobs.”

“We now all see how much others miss out on in traditional classes.  We have never experienced and probably will never experience this type and level of teaching again.”

Another important facet of DMGS is the free-thinking aspect that underpins its pedagogic approach as the professors encourage their students to question everything rather than blindly following one school of thought. This is an approach which Margalita describes as “unique in today’s world that is oversaturated by opinion.”

“The minute you create an environment when you shut each other down, the learning ends.  DMGS clearly understands this and opens up the learning environment to embrace all ideas.”

This openness to multiple viewpoints also extends to multiple cultures.  By opening up its programs to those from other countries who seek to make the world a better and safer place, DMGS creates a dynamic and exciting learning environment.  Margalita is also very enthusiastic about this and about the impact it has on the school’s environment.

“It’s a real privilege to be in the class with people from so many different backgrounds.  It adds to our discussions in an amazing way.”

Finally, Margalita is also extremely enthusiastic about DMGS’ location and networking opportunities.“Being in D.C., magic happens outside the classroom.  We meet the people that we only read about previously. We effectively meet history here.”

KENNETH’S STORY

His artistic talent earned him a place at the Art Institute of Boston, majoring in illustration.  However, Kenneth left after a year because he was disappointed with the course content and did not want to waste his time on a course that did not fulfill him or develop his talents and aspirations.  After some self-reflection, deliberation and research, he eventually decided to go to CUNY to study business and entrepreneurship to learn how to turn his artistic skills into “a business not a just passion.”
Upon graduation from the CUNY program, he took a break for a year to evaluate his next step.  He experimented and explored different areas, starting a number of innovative art ventures and productions.  He also took hospitality jobs to help finance his ventures.  Yet Kenneth still felt as though he were missing something and, while he was contemplating joining the Peace Corps, his mentor advised him to look at DMGS.
He is well aware that many may not immediately make the connection between the study of Intelligence in conjunction with Business Entrepreneurship or Art.
Consequently, Kenneth goes on to explain that there are many areas in the private sector that require intelligence skills, describing it as an underserved field that is wide open for graduates.  As time has progressed, Kenneth’s eyes have increasingly been opened to the niche positioning that a Master’s in Intelligence could bring to him to make him highly marketable in his fields of interest.
“I realized that being adept at intelligence-gathering in Business Arts and Media would be a specialized niche.  I wouldn’t have to start my own business but instead would instantly have differentiated value upon graduation.”
To explain this further, Kenneth describes how intelligence is a key factor in making effective market and business decisions since being competitive requires knowing what competitors are doing in the marketplace.  Even coming up with the title to a song can be amplified by intelligence gathering techniques as that information strengthens all strategic decision-making.
‘The Fundamentals of Intelligence course really taught me how to gather human intelligence – not just as it applies to spies – but to effectively make “informed decisions” using competitive intelligence.  I learned how to craft a market analysis through public information.  Knowing where to look and how to search things out it essential in all areas of business.”
Kenneth then turns to the subject of his professors.  Like all the other students at DMGS, Kenneth cannot help but comment on how exceptional members of DMGS’ faculty are.  In his opinion,, compared to other professors who “speak much but say little,”DMGS’ professors really deliver what he calls “the bottom line of knowledge in their subjects,” adding that there is “no fluff or wordiness” as they simply and clearly present relevant information in a succinct and pertinent form.
“They have years of experience and can therefore distill down what really matters in a real work setting. They then communicate the essence of each topic in a way that sticks with the student. Educators like this are few and far between.  It is amazing to be in such small classes with such great professors.”
At DMGS, one can’t help but feel the warmth and camaraderie amongst the students.  This is something that Kenneth clearly feels very deeply himself. 
“I also admire my fellow students who have all done such amazing things before coming here.  They inspire me to up my game and it humbles me to break bread and to study alongside people who have experienced even greater challenges than I and who ensure that I always keep an open mind.”
Pressed for an example of this, Kenneth talks about a couple of his fellow students: one who is a Kurd from Iran and one from Georgia who has lived in the shadow of the Soviet Union.
Before ending the discussion, Kenneth says that he must also stress two other things: DMGS’ speaker series and the school’s founder, Abby Moffat. The events, he says, have been hugely important to the learning environment because they reinforce what students are taught in the classroom and they also provide great networking opportunities, as students have the chance to engage with a number of prominent people in their fields of interest.
In describing Abby Moffat, he recounts how much she adds to the positive culture of DMGS.  Kenneth also mentions that Abby has been particularly inspiring and encouraging to him on a personal level and that has made a big difference in his life.
“Abby Moffat brings a nurturing and compassionate entrepreneur spirit to the school.  Her strength, kindness and insights drive the organization, just as my grandmothers’ strengths and courage drove the successes within my own family.”

RST 733, COMPARATIVE POLITICS

Comparative politics is the study of political systems around the globe. In this course, we will examine how political institutions, actors, and processes arise, operate and change around the world and how they affect society, culture, and the economy. The course combines theory with in-depth examinations of case studies from particular regions of the world. We will seek to explain why the Arab Spring broke out and why it failed to produce democratic transitions in many Middle Eastern states. We will examine what has caused civil wars to break out in certain parts of Africa but not in others. We will explore why democracy took root in Eastern Europe but not in most states of the former Soviet Union. And we will look at how China’s approach to economic development differs from that of Western powers.

MDV 650, FOUNDATIONS OF MANAGING DISRUPTION AND VIOLENCE

The Managing Disruption and Violence (MDV) Program provides theoretical and practical training to help students gain a better understanding of the persuasive communication principles, concepts, and processes organizations need to address the potential or active threat of disruptive or violent group behavior. MDV 650 integrates a broad overview of the material included in MDV 700 Integrated Risk Value Concepts and MDV 701 Causal Analytics for the non-MDV major. The Integrated Risk Value© (IRV) methodology provides the practical skills needed to develop and manage successful persuasive communications programs. MDV 650 is a prerequisite for non-MDV majors to take MDV 702 Strategy for Managing Disruption and Violence.

RST 725 – ISLAMIC POLITICS AND TERRORISM

Islamic revivalism is one of the most significant political, social and cultural phenomena of the 21st century, and will remain a potent force in the foreseeable future. Islamist movements are not monolithic, and tactics differ toward gaining power and implementing Islamic law. In recent years some Islamists have participated in politics and gained power through elections such as Hamas in Gaza, Ennahda in Tunisia, and the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt. Others have taken up arms to resist violently against the state in Libya, Sinai, Syria, Iraq and Yemen. The Islamic Republic of Iran expands its empire through proxies and terrorist militias.

Al-Qaeda and Islamic State do not recognize the notion of the international Westphalian state system, and strive to erase recognized borders in the areas in which they operate to resurrect an Islamic empire called the Caliphate. While hatred of Israel, the West, secularism and liberal democracy persists, the immediate victims of militant Islamist violence are non-conforming Muslims and ethnic-religious minorities.

The course will analyze the ideology and goals of Sunni and Shia Islamist movements. It will assess what motivates these movements and why they are successful, and analyze their strengths and weaknesses. The course will explore their attitudes of the crisis of Islam in the contemporary era; the desired form of Islamic governance; the meaning of jihad in the contemporary era; and the compatibility between Islam and democracy. In particular, the course will examine Hamas, Hezbollah, the Muslim Brotherhood, the Iranian revolutionary regime, the Taliban, al-Qaeda, and Islamic State.

RST 727, RUSSIAN POLITICS AND STATECRAFT

This survey course on Russian politics and statecraft addresses enduring questions on: patterns of cooperation and confrontation with other great powers, a centrally dominated economy, and a political culture that exploits weak formal political institutions to sustain a very small leadership ground. In addressing these issues, we ask: What are the wars that have defined Russia’s borders? When and why do Russian leaders challenge other states? What does power in Russia look like? Who are the rulers and their supporters? How do they obtain, practice, and lose power?
In reviewing the origins and practices of Russian statecraft, we will assess when Russia as a great power has been (dis-) satisfied with the international distribution of economic and political benefits, and when it has sought to revise or maintain the international order. We will use this knowledge to address current issues in Russia’s relations with the Euro-Atlantic alliance and other world powers, including contentious issues such as money laundering, sanctions regimes, “information wars,” and Russia’s declared and undeclared conflicts.

RST 732, EURASIAN SECURITY

This course examines the security dynamics of Eurasia through an analysis of the policies of its largest state, Russia. The course examines the drivers of Russia’s pivot to Asia, Russia’s policies towards its Near Abroad, Asia-Pacific, South Asia and the Middle East, and the limitations of Russian influence. Through the course, students will gain a better understanding of the complexities of Russia’s dealings in a range of Asian regions, critically evaluate Russia as a global power. Class discussions and many of the readings will be focused on understanding and analyzing Russia’s contemporary policies with the view to giving students the ability to forecast the likely contours of domestic and foreign policy in the coming years. By the end of the course, students will have gained a more nuanced understanding of Russia, allowing them to critically approach some of the simplistic interpretations of Russian behavior in the media.

NSC 710 – HOMELAND SECURITY

This course introduces students to current public management policies and issues relevant to the security of the United States. The coordination of federal, state and local government agencies and nonprofit organizations which respond to threats is vital to the security of people, property and our way of life. The course relies upon theories, concepts and case studies to explore the challenges facing organizations which are a part of protecting our homeland security.

INT 610 – FUNDAMENTALS OF INTELLIGENCE

This is an introductory course in intelligence practices for those looking to enter this field or interact with it. The course identifies the component parts of the Intelligence Community, describes the functions of collection and analysis, explains how intelligence is disseminated, and discusses the relationship of the IC with policymakers, Congress, and the public. This course will provide students the foundation of knowledge to prepare for more advanced study in intelligence or related fields.
Students who complete this course will:
• Identify the members of the Intelligence Community and their roles;
• Discuss the intelligence cycle and other functions of intelligence; and
• Analyze the relationship of the IC with the different branches of government and the public

NSC 611 – US-CHINA STRATEGIC RELATIONS

Understanding contemporary Chinese history, starting with the Qing Dynasty, with a focus on post 1979 normalization of Sino-U.S. relations, will permit the students to better understand China’s approach to relations with the U.S. Knowledge of China’s military and political organizations will permit the students to better understand these organs of power and how they attempt to manage the plethora of international and domestic issues confronting China. It will also permit the student to appreciate the complexity of crafting a national strategy for dealing with an expansionist China.

MDV 700 – INTEGRATED RISK VALUE COMMUNICATIONS CONCEPTS

The Managing Disruption and Violence (MDV) Program provides theoretical and practical training to help students gain a better understanding of the persuasive communication principles, concepts, and processes organizations need to address the potential or active threat of disruptive or violent group behavior. MDV 700 teaches the in-depth and practical application of the Integrated Risk Value © (IRV) methodology for MDV majors.

This course provides the concepts and processes for developing and evaluating predictably successful communication strategies. Its focus includes practical frameworks to evaluate communication efforts, the strategic cycle and planning of IRV Communications, as well as an emphasis on developing Measures of Effectiveness. This course, combined with MDV 701 Causal Analytics, contributes the in-depth practical understanding, processes and concepts needed for an MDV major to become a practitioner who manages and evaluates the development, implementation and impact of communication strategies.

NSC 601, INTRODUCTION TO NATIONAL SECURITY

This course is divided into four parts. Part I will focus on generally accepted concepts of deception and counter deception with an emphasis on the underlying concepts that enable operational and strategic deceptions. Part II is designed to introduce the student to operational level deception and its impact on national decision making and warning. Part III will build upon parts one and two in order to facilitate the construction of a holistic model for Russian Strategic Deception and Information Confrontation. Part IV will move beyond strategic military and information confrontation and analyze strategic-political deception and provocations and apply previous concepts to a detailed analysis of current events.

INT 712, COLLECTION, ANALYSIS AND PRESENTATION

This course provides a critical overview of the Intelligence Cycle – from collection to analysis to presentation. The course assesses intelligence-gathering techniques and approaches for various types of information including HUMINT, SIGINT, etc. It then acquaints students with aspects of Intelligence Analysis; the evaluation of data through the use of subject expertise, critical thinking, and the application of techniques designed to overcome limitations in human cognition. It will examine the analysts’ role in the larger national security arena, state, and local organizations and in the private sector. And it will show the importance of the effective presentation of this information under varying circumstances and leadership desires.

Through this course, students will be able to:

NSC 639, RESEARCH METHODS FOR SOCIAL SCIENCES

This course is divided into four discreet, yet interdependent parts:

Qualitative Research Methods;
Quantitative Research Methods;
Critical Thinking and Complexity Theory; and
Writing Workshop
The overall objectives/learning outcomes are to:

Equip students with the ability, skills and knowledge to conduct and produce quality research in the rapidly changing environment of 21st social science; and
To give students the skills to evaluate and analyze a wide variety of social science situations in order to develop and enact new policy solutions to contemporary
The objectives/learning outcomes for the sections on qualitative and quantitative research methods are to equip students with an understanding, expertise and ability to apply the most important contemporary research methods currently in use in the social sciences.

The objectives/learning outcomes for the section on critical thinking and complexity theory are to equip students with an understanding, expertise and ability to conduct research and apply solutions to the most complex social science issues in the increasingly interdependent, globalizing world.

The objectives/learning outcomes for the writing workshop are to direct students to apply the methods and skills they learned in the three previous sections, to improve their writing skills and to help prepare them for the research and preparation of their masters’ thesis and set in place the ability to produce quality work in the future.

MDV 728 – INFLUENCE AND DECEPTION IN THE CYBER DOMAIN

The course is designed to lay the historical, thematic and contemporary context that will provide the fundamental perspective and foundational knowledge required to successfully recognize, analyze and initiate counter deception activates. This course is designed for analysts in order to equip them with the necessary knowledge to understand the impact of the internet of things has on deception and influence operations. This course is divided into four parts. Part I will focus on generally accepted concepts of cyberspace itself, basic terminology and the law governing intelligence operations in cyberspace. Part II is designed to introduce the student to the use of cyberspace as a channel to reach key decision makers and the impact near instantaneous communications has on deception operations. This part will include the deceptive use of cyber based social media and issues surrounding the use of real and virtual agents and double agents in deception operations. Part III will introduce the impact of surreptitious manipulation of data while it moves between the sender and the receiver. This part will also focus on cyber systems as sources of deceptive information and specifically on the use of cyber systems as agents and double agents, honeypots and honeynets, and sources of deceptive information.

















NSC 727: POLITICAL STRATEGY AND U.S. NATIONAL SECURITY

In this course, students will examine political strategies, which involves a range of ways and means—diplomacy, education and training, security assistance, humanitarian aid, media, and other overt and discreet methods. Students will discover how such strategies affect a society’s political life, including its formal governing arrangements, culture and popular sentiments, as well as external and strategic orientation. Additionally, this course will identify America’s need for political strategy through foreign policy and diplomacy by improving alliance and coalition relationships, while weakening adversaries, to foster a more open, law-based and just international order.

Students will examine how political strategy impacts national security initiatives by discussing the political dimensions of the primary challenges facing American security policy today.  Furthermore, students will assess how to deal with challenges posed by resurgent authoritarianism to the post-1991 “liberal world order” and how it structures U>S> alliances like Europe, Asia, and the Middle East.  This course will highlight the weakening of Westphalian state-based order in the Middle East and how a variety of revisionist and hostile actors have profited from it.  Finally, this course will discuss various political strategies and international policy operation capabilities that the United States can use to combat the problem of state fragility by designing a “whole of government, who of society” concept that is needed to compete in a new environment with advanced interests and principles.

NSC 711: U.S. AND FOREIGN PERSPECTIVES ON STRATEGIC APPROACHES

This course is an introduction to approaches in strategy, which exposes students to strategic thought and theorists who have influenced both Eastern and Western practices of strategic methods. It provides a foundation in strategic theory and approaches to strategic thought as an analytical framework to understanding the cultural, religious, historical, and leadership sources of state and non-state actor behavior. It also discusses foreign and U.S. perspectives as well as concepts on the use of force (strength), stratagems (guile) and the power of information (ideas). Strategy must be developed in a holistic manner, integrating the diplomatic, informational, military and economic elements of power in a “whole of government” approach. Furthermore, students will better understand the strategy formulation process of ends, ways and means. At the course’s conclusion, students will formulate an alternative Strategy, which balances the approaches of strength and guile, coupled with the means to influence state and non-state actors with its ideas and economic resources to counteract an adversary’s strategy.

NSC 639: RESEARCH METHODS FOR SOCIAL SCIENCES

This course is divided into four discreet, yet interdependent parts:

The overall objectives/learning outcomes are to:

The objectives/learning outcomes for the sections on qualitative and quantitative research methods are to equip students with an understanding, expertise and ability to apply the most important contemporary research methods currently in use in the social sciences.

The objectives/learning outcomes for the section on critical thinking and complexity theory are to equip students with an understanding, expertise and ability to conduct research and apply solutions to the most complex social science issues in the increasingly interdependent, globalizing world.

The objectives/learning outcomes for the writing workshop are to direct students to apply the methods and skills they learned in the three previous sections, to improve their writing skills and to help prepare them for the research and preparation of their masters’ thesis and set in place the ability to produce quality work in the future.

NSC 601: INTRODUCTION TO NATIONAL SECURITY

This course is divided into four parts. Part I will focus on generally accepted concepts of deception and counter deception with an emphasis on the underlying concepts that enable operational and strategic deceptions. Part II is designed to introduce the student to operational level deception and its impact on national decision making and warning. Part III will build upon parts one and two in order to facilitate the construction of a holistic model for Russian Strategic Deception and Information Confrontation. Part IV will move beyond strategic military and information confrontation and analyze strategic-political deception and provocations and apply previous concepts to a detailed analysis of current events.

INT 714: COUNTER INTELLIGENCE

The aim of this course is to show how counterintelligence activity protects US national security by 1) defending against acts of penetration, sabotage, and physical violence undertaken by foreign intelligence agencies; and 2) defeating an adversary’s efforts by identifying and manipulating its behavior through deception and/or the exploitation of its agents. The course addresses the relationship between the intelligence and law enforcement communities as well as between civilian and military agencies. It also emphasizes the increasing importance of cyber espionage and economic espionage in an age of globalization.

Through this course, students will: • Analyze methods to defend against foreign and domestic espionage; •

MDV 729: RUSSIAN DECEPTION, OPERATIONS AND INFORMATION CONFRONTATION

Russian Deception, Operations and Information Confrontation is designed to lay the historical, thematic and contemporary context that will provide the fundamental perspective and foundational knowledge required to successfully recognize, analyze and initiate counter deception activates. This course is designed for analysts in order to equip them with the necessary knowledge to understand the impact of Russian deception. This in-depth study of Russian deception practices will trace the evolution of the art specific to Russian over the course of the past century starting in 1917 and ending with the implementation of Russia’s Information Confrontation doctrine. The course is designed to address these issues functionally starting with basic military/tactical deceptions and progressing through the use of strategic enablers, provocations and influence operations.